Martin Probst a écrit : > Hi, > > if you care for "really different languages", there is XSLTC which > compiles XSL transformations into bytecode, as far as I know, but it's > not really under active development. > > And there are at least two XQuery implementations that compile to Java > or bytecodes, by Per Bothner (hello :-)) and by Michael Kay of Saxon > fame. XQuery is a purely functional domain specific language (XML > querying), so this might be interesting to people. > > I'd also hesitate to call ANTLR a programming language, as the > grammars are not turing complete (I think), but it's certainly a > domain specific language that compiles to Java code. And maybe they > are interesting because they have some really different problems with > what they do. For example, they kept running into class file, method > size, etc. limits for their DFAs and other generated code. > I've never understood why yacc or ANTLR are DSLs.
It's not that complex to have a clean separation between the specification of the grammar and the action to execute when you reduce. > My list would be JRuby, Scala, Duby (indeed), XQuery, ANTLR. > > Regards, > Martin > Rémi --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
