> > I have a lot of sympathy for the position that you outline in your > blog post but I would like to wait for the EDR to be published before > coming to a settled view on the matter. The devil is in the details > and I have not seem all the details yet. >
I am totally agree. At the end of the day what I say is that API understanded by JVM is better then a new bytecode because it is backword compatible :) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
