Robert Fischer wrote: > I've started down the SSA route for Cornerstone, too. This is why I'm not > back to using your BS > library yet. I'd be very interested in working with other people to do SSA > work, though.
Forgive me if I missed it, but what's Cornerstone? I'm intrigued. > I'm not particularly interested in a dynamically-typed SSA library since > correctness is critical in > the SSA, and if I didn't have the type safety, I'd want to implement it. > Although I could be sold > another direction on that point. Are you saying you'd rather have the SSA library implemented in Java? I don't think any of us are against that, and it would definitely be more generally-applicable. > I'm also less excited about CPS, since that's going to tend towards optimized > code resulting in > non-recursive function tail calls, which I'm trying to avoid until we get a > version of the JVM which > can optimize them. I believe TCO has already landed on MLVM, so it's at least on the way. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
