Tobias Ivarsson wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter > <charles.nut...@sun.com <mailto:charles.nut...@sun.com>> wrote: > > > Robert Fischer wrote: > > I know, and I'm crazy excited. How is that being implemented, > BTW? Did they remove the GOTO > > restriction, or is there a new byte code to trigger a tail call? > > I believe it's a new bytecode, or else some other artificial marker. > It's not done automatically. > > > They use the WIDE-opcode before the invoke* bytecode to annotate the > instruction as a tail-call. > so WIDE+INVOKE*+RETURN == tailcall.
Ahh, good to know. Nice and simple. - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
