On Friday 03 April 2009 14:59:03 Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > Jon Harrop wrote: > > If you cannot get tail calls accepted into the required standard, then > > release an additional non-standard JVM that includes the existing > > implementation of tail call elimination (and potentially other useful > > features). > > Or you could do it, since you seem to have the money and resources to > build a new VM from scratch. I think it would be more cost-effective to > start with OpenJDK and improve from there.
How difficult would it be to implement typed nulls and value types in OpenJDK? -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
