On Friday 10 April 2009 10:41:57 Attila Szegedi wrote: > My stance is that it is, in the same sense as GC is. See, memory > management is not specified *at all* in the JVM specification.
While that analogy has a sound theoretical foundation it completely ignores practicality. Imagine how successful the JVM would be if *all* of the available implementations died if there were 10,000 reachable objects. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
