Jon Harrop wrote: > On Friday 10 April 2009 10:41:57 Attila Szegedi wrote: > >> My stance is that it is, in the same sense as GC is. See, memory >> management is not specified *at all* in the JVM specification. >> > > While that analogy has a sound theoretical foundation it completely ignores > practicality. Imagine how successful the JVM would be if *all* of the > available implementations died if there were 10,000 reachable objects. > > which is why it's a good one for TCO.
Regards, Kirk --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jvm-languages+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
