On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Per Bothner<[email protected]> wrote:
> However, let's not make the perfect be the enemy of the good > - at the very least we really should fix the size limitations, > because that is a hard limit. Having all these 16-bit limits > when the world is moving to 64-bit is ridiculous. This would indeed be great - the C implementation of Python can handle very large method bodies, but Jython currently can't. So we see code in the wild that we can't run. We will grow an interpreted mode in the next few months, and so will be able to handle this (but with a performance hit I'm sure). It would be much better if it just worked. -Frank --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
