On Jul 6, 2009, at 5:22 PM, Neal Gafter wrote: > JSR 202, which explicitly included the expansion of these limits in > its charter but never actually made the necessary changes.
Good point... Given that they did not exhaust their charter, I guess it would be more reasonable to revive the JSR, than to create a new one. The JCP allows specification amendments. -- John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
