On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Jon Harrop <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you want JVM+TCO then you should already be able to use OpenJDK. Another > forthcoming option may be VMKit, which is a JVM and CLR built upon LLVM > (which provides TCO so it should be relatively easy to add if it has not been > done already). Or, of course, use or build a completely different VM already > provides TCO... LLVM provides it only on certain hardwares, and I believe it optimizes only tail recursion, not general tail calls. > > -- > Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "JVM Languages" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en. > > > -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
