John~

I can pretty much guarantee that the new maintainer will be amenable to
patches that help Janino as a utility to use in compilers.  As it turns out,
I am the new maintainer ;-)

My current idea is not to do heavy duty optimizations like register coloring
and variable minimization, but to focus on optimizations that will be a
clear win (dead code elimination, constant propagation, conditional
result propagation (is there a better term for that?)).

Matt

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:17 PM, John Cowan <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > You bet your bippy I would. I've been wishing for something like "LLVM
> > for JVM bytecode" for a long time. I've been meaning to look at Janino
> > to replace our current compiler backend, but have been spending more
> > time on integration aspects of JRuby lately.
>
> Janino has been dead for about a year, but there is now a new official
> maintainer (Codehaus just flipped the necessary bits a week ago), so
> we can expect to see some movement.  Note that Janino is deliberately
> Java 1.4, so if you want generics you have to erase them yourself.  I
> don't consider that a serious problem for generated code.
>
> I proposed a long time ago to add "goto" to Janino, which would remove
> a huge amount of the incentive to generate bytecode directly.  The
> proposal was turned down, but the new moderator might be more
> receptive, especially if a patch was provided.  (You can do a lot of
> what goto does with "do ... while (false)" and judicious use of break,
> but it's messy.)
>
> I'm not sure that making Janino do its own optimizations is really a
> win: too-clever bytecode generators, as we know, can cause JITs to
> pessimize the code.  But I'm willing to be convinced otherwise.
>
> --
> GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at
> http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures
>
> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "JVM Languages" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<jvm-languages%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
>
>
>

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.


Reply via email to