I guess a distinction must be drawn between a simple language and a simple implementation of a language.
They're many times not interchangeable. :-) On 6 September 2010 05:08, Randall R Schulz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sunday September 5 2010, Dibyendu Majumdar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am starting work on implementing the Go like language for the JVM >> and was wondering if there is a simple toy language implementation >> for the JVM that I could look at. Is anyone aware of such an >> implementation? > > Clojure might qualify as a relatively simple language from the > perspective of code generation. > > >> I am looking to implement a hand-coded lexer/parser for the language. > > Why? > > >> Thanks and Regards >> Dibyendu > > > Randall Schulz > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "JVM Languages" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en. > > -- ---- vruz ---- alterius non sit qui suus esse potest -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en.
