jvm-languages  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects [email protected]
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Guillaume Laforge
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
  • [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Subbu Sastry
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: primitives as objects Charles Oliver Nutter
• [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
  • [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community jamesl
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Jim Baker
  • [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Lucky
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community John Cowan
  • [jvm-l] Re: IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community JerryG
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Kirk
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community David MacIver
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] IO, finalization, and expectations from the Ruby community Kirk
• [jvm-l] classfile reading tool iulian dragos
  • Re: [jvm-l] classfile reading tool Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] classfile reading tool iulian dragos
  • Re: [jvm-l] classfile reading tool Rémi Forax
• [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code iulian dragos
  • Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code James Abley
  • Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code iulian dragos
  • Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code iulian dragos
  • Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] peek at jit-compiled native code iulian dragos
  • [jvm-l] LogCompilation output Kirk
  • Re: [jvm-l] LogCompilation output John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] LogCompilation output Kirk
  • Re: [jvm-l] LogCompilation output John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] LogCompilation output Kirk
  • Re: [jvm-l] LogCompilation output Kirk
• [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? John Rose
  • [jvm-l] Re: JVM options to turn server into client? ijuma
  • [jvm-l] Re: JVM options to turn server into client? ijuma
  • Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Hannes Wallnoefer
  • Re: [jvm-l] JVM options to turn server into client? Charles Oliver Nutter
• [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] Stack value extractor in Java Rémi Forax
• [jvm-l] Stable and stationary values Ian Rogers
• [jvm-l] categorical subclasses John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] categorical subclasses Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] categorical subclasses John Rose
• [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError John Wilson
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError John Wilson
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] the mysterios IllegalAccessError Alessio Stalla
• [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] A second way of getting Class information needed? Per Bothner
• [jvm-l] Update on Ravi Programming Language Dibyendu Majumdar
• [jvm-l] More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
  • [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] More on: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
• [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
  • Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
  • Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Christian Vest Hansen
  • Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
  • Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? John Cowan
  • Re: [jvm-l] Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Peter Veentjer
  • [jvm-l] Re: Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • [jvm-l] Re: Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Ben Schulz
  • [jvm-l] Re: Non-volatile fields as an ok "soft" thread local? Charles Oliver Nutter
• [jvm-l] Using ANTLR Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Using ANTLR Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
  • [jvm-l] Re: Using ANTLR Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Using ANTLR Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: Using ANTLR Dibyendu Majumdar
• [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Matt Fowles
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster John Cowan
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Jim Baker
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Battling the code size monster Matt Fowles
• [jvm-l] Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Matt Fowles
  • Re: [jvm-l] Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Small static method marked not entrant, inlining reversed? John Rose
  • [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly John Rose
  • [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Jochen Theodorou
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: loading metaclasses quickly Jochen Theodorou
• [jvm-l] Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Naming the new language Rodrigo B. de Oliveira
  • [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Naming the new language Charles Oliver Nutter
  • [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
  • [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Dibyendu Majumdar
  • [jvm-l] Re: Naming the new language Brian Frank
• [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM vruz
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Tom Davies
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Richard L. Burton III
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Ben Evans
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Tom Davies
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM vruz
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Attila Szegedi
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Attila Szegedi
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Angel Java Lopez
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Kirk
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Angel Java Lopez
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Per Bothner
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM John Wilson
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Randall R Schulz
  • Re: [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM John Cowan
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Jim White
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Patrick Wright
  • Re: [jvm-l] Simplest language implementation for the JVM Rémi Forax
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
  • [jvm-l] Re: Simplest language implementation for the JVM Dibyendu Majumdar
• [jvm-l] where can I get the "typechecking verifier" specification? iulian dragos
  • Re: [jvm-l] where can I get the "typechecking verifier" specification? Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] where can I get the "typechecking verifier" specification? John Rose
  • Re: [jvm-l] where can I get the "typechecking verifier" specification? iulian dragos
• [jvm-l] Nan boxing Rémi Forax
• [jvm-l] Optimizing arbitrary-precision integer math Charles Oliver Nutter
  • Re: [jvm-l] Optimizing arbitrary-precision integer math Ola Bini
  • Re: [jvm-l] Optimizing arbitrary-precision integer math John Wilson
• [jvm-l] Reference for Charles Ola Bini
  • Re: [jvm-l] Reference for Charles vruz
• [jvm-l] Totally OT (Jvm Summit) Rémi Forax
  • Re: [jvm-l] Totally OT (Jvm Summit) Attila Szegedi

• Earlier messages
• Later messages