WK <[email protected]> writes: > When I look at the start page for this group, I see lots of people > complaining about exactly the same error about k9 and ssl. Do you really > think that they all use "bad" mobile providers who filter port 587? This > port is one of the most important ports on the net, because more and more > e-mail providers use it for ssl encrypted smtp connections. Do you really > believe that all those carrier providers will keep their customers from > accessing their mail in an encrypted way?
I have actually experienced SSL MITM on wifi, where one can connect to 587, but gets a manufactured certificate. So it's not inconceivable that a carrier would do this. Also, k-9 with outbound TLS works for a large number of people. To answer your question, I believe that until we understand exactly what's wrong, we don't understand. I merely suggested that you should check to see that the "working" clients are actually working correctly with respect to security. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the K-9 Mail Users List. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, email [email protected] To report an issue with K-9 Mail, visit http://code.google.com/p/k9mail/issues/list For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/k-9-mail --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "K-9 Mail" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
pgp2S55fZAS3i.pgp
Description: PGP signature
