Even if it could, I think it's highly pointless to do spam processing on a cell phone...
On 6 May 2017 9:12 AM, "Bud Tugglie" <[email protected]> wrote: > This is BS! Thunderbird runs on machines with less power than a cell > phone - and does an acceptable job of spam filtering. You are blowing > smoke..... K9 could filter much of the spam, if developers were willing. > > On Thursday, April 6, 2017 at 7:27:55 AM UTC-4, Benoit-Pierre DEMAINE > wrote: >> >> Thunderbird is a desktop app which runs on machines with 1TB disk, quad >> 4G cpu, 20 GB ram, and disks able to feed 300MB/s. It has the ressources to >> perform very complex rules and neural network. Mobile phones won't have >> these ressources before years. And TB is not doing good job (basic features >> are still stated as feature requests since over 13 years in bugzilla ). >> >> The best k9 could do is, have a spam button, and notify server that some >> message is a spam. Not even sure imap supports this. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "K-9 Mail" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "K-9 Mail" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
