Linuxhippy wrote:
Kaffe is not powerful enough to be a java-replacement, in many part gcj beats kaffe in both, performance and plenarity. But GCJ has not those features, which so many people like on Java: No linker problems! There a three different Classpath implementations on the "market". First theres the GNU-Classpath implementation (I think this is the most useful, because every VM can use it without big effort), the Kaffe-Implementation and then the GCJ implementation.
IMHO there's room for both gcj and kaffe.
I do think some cosolidation would be good, but I think Dalibor is doing a good job of vacuuming up improvements from various places and bringing them into Kaffe. I can't comment on mono (I'm emotionally unqualified to do so :-) - Dan _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
