> I dont want to FUD kaffe-folks, but please think a bit about my ideas > why developing kaffe is a waste of time. > > > Kaffe is not powerful enough to be a java-replacement, in many part gcj > beats kaffe in both, performance and plenarity.
Kaffe is a virtual machine. gcj is a native runtime package. A virtual machine can, at least in theory, offer a higher degree of security and reliability. A native compiler/runtime package can, at least in theory, offer a higher level of performance. Which is better depends on the application. It would probably be pretty rational to eventually have a common code base between the Kaffe and libgcj for the basic bytecode interpretaters, though. _______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
