Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:49:22 +0100, Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
robilad> your patch looks good to me, so I'd like to check it in. But robilad> ...
Thank you for looking my patch.
Thanks for writing it ;)
robilad> I need your confirmation that you're not 'tainted', i.e. robilad> have looked at Sun's sources, decompiled their class robilad> libraries, or signed an NDA preventing you from contributing robilad> to a free java effort.
OK, I'm not tainted. I have never done any of those. Please don't worry.
Great!
robilad> That being said, I'd like to encourage you to keep up the robilad> good work. If you continue "flooding" us with good patches, robilad> I'll ask Jim to grant you CVS access.
Thank you. For now, I'm comfort without CVS write access. First, currently I do not have any pending patches. Second, for me, "no CVS write access" means somebody review my patch (and will reject it if I do silly things) before check it in.
So if you can accept spending some of your time on my patches, I will not want CVS write access.
That's fine with me.
robilad> So, if I understand everything correctly, kaffe, when robilad> compiled on mipsel-linux, can build the class library (using robilad> kjc) with your patch & jit3? That would be quite huge.
No, currently. Even with my patch, "make" fails on first "compile_time test" if the kaffe configured for jit3.
O.k. If you're interested in trying to fix the jitter, Tim Stack might be able to give you some advice on how to debug those failures.
cheers, dalibor topic
_______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe
