Mikolaj Habryn wrote:
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 14:10, Dalibor Topic wrote:

Sounds like a good guess. Could you reconfigure and try again using libffi?


Didn't change the situation, alas. I'm faintly suspicious of libffi; I had thought that it didn't support MIPS (and the MIPS habit of changing
the calling convention for leaf vs non-leaf functions makes me wonder
how libffi manages at all!) but I'm still poking at it.

Hi Mikolaj,

I've CC:ed Casey, who's been hacking on libffi for MIPS recently. You may want to drag out libffi straight from gcc CVS, as no gcc release contains Casey's fixes yet afaik.

cheers,
dalibor topic


_______________________________________________ kaffe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kaffe.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kaffe

Reply via email to