Re: large Class.forName() patch

[Jason Baker]

Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
>   #define INTEGER_PRIMITIVE_CLASS     "I"
> 
> and use INTEGER_PRIMITIVE_CLASS instead of "int".. would this work?

No, its even worse, since a class in the anonymous package is alot
more likely to be called "I" than "int".  We can use "I" only where a
class would be L<path>;.  

Jason