Re: large Class.forName() patch

[Godmar Back]

 I'm working on it.  We'll first try renaming the basic types internally
w/o breaking gcj (Jason sent me a patch for that), and see where that gets 
us, and then the rest.  I think we should be able to match Sun's output
exactly.  Unfortunately, egcs broke on me right after I checked it out
today so waiting on that to be fixed before I can do that.
Thanks very much for your regression test.

        - Godmar

> 
> It sounds like there is still some debate as to how the
> primitive classes should be searched for by name, so could
> we agree on this trimmed down patch that does not include
> the part that disables lookups for "int" and such?
>