Re: large Class.forName() patch

[Godmar Back]

> 
> 
> On Thu, 3 Feb 100, Godmar Back wrote:
> 
> Ok, that sounds like a plan. The only other problem I noticed is that
> Kaffe seems to use plain char* types for class names. These class names
> really should be in unicode strings or at least UTF8 strings. The
> current Kaffe implementation means that a \0 embedded in the class name
> will screw up code that expects a \0 at the end of a string. One
> of the regression test checks for this.
> 

We should probably keep all descriptors/identifiers that were derived 
from uft8consts in the constant pool as utf8consts all the time.

        - Godmar