I think it might be useful for the community to have a couple more releases
for 0.7.*, at least until 0.8 is fully stable.

Thanks,
Neha

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Chris Burroughs
<chris.burrou...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I added a 0.7.2 release in JIRA for you (Joe, do you have the bits
> flipped to be able to do this?)
>
> On 07/18/2012 02:05 PM, Joe Stein wrote:
> > I was thinking we would have a 0.7.2 release if there are patches in
> trunk
> > that folks want to use, why not release them and make it available for
> > them?  I don't mind doing releases ... double commits make this
> manageable
> >
> > 0.7.X off trunk, yup
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 0.7.1 patch == patch to apply on branch 0.7.1 or trunk? I thought we
> would
> >> be doing double-commits on trunk and 0.8 and not worry about release
> >> branches for now. Also, 0.7.2 would be cut off trunk. (Both 0.7.1 and
> 0.7
> >> were cut off trunk.)
> >>
> >> Joel
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> People tend to produce patches against the 0.7.1. Currently I think we
> >> are
> >>> urging double commits on trunk and 0.8 because the large code
> difference
> >>> makes auto merges too dangerous. However I don't think we are likely to
> >> do
> >>> a 0.7.2 release (0.8 is not too far out at this point). So I think we
> >>> should be advising people to giving any non-critical patches just
> against
> >>> 0.8, right?
> >>>
> >>> Thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> -Jay
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to