Cool, then I guess we can go case by case on double-checkins to trunk and 0.8.
-Jay On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Neha Narkhede <neha.narkh...@gmail.com>wrote: > I think it might be useful for the community to have a couple more releases > for 0.7.*, at least until 0.8 is fully stable. > > Thanks, > Neha > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Chris Burroughs > <chris.burrou...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > I added a 0.7.2 release in JIRA for you (Joe, do you have the bits > > flipped to be able to do this?) > > > > On 07/18/2012 02:05 PM, Joe Stein wrote: > > > I was thinking we would have a 0.7.2 release if there are patches in > > trunk > > > that folks want to use, why not release them and make it available for > > > them? I don't mind doing releases ... double commits make this > > manageable > > > > > > 0.7.X off trunk, yup > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Joel Koshy <jjkosh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> 0.7.1 patch == patch to apply on branch 0.7.1 or trunk? I thought we > > would > > >> be doing double-commits on trunk and 0.8 and not worry about release > > >> branches for now. Also, 0.7.2 would be cut off trunk. (Both 0.7.1 and > > 0.7 > > >> were cut off trunk.) > > >> > > >> Joel > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> People tend to produce patches against the 0.7.1. Currently I think > we > > >> are > > >>> urging double commits on trunk and 0.8 because the large code > > difference > > >>> makes auto merges too dangerous. However I don't think we are likely > to > > >> do > > >>> a 0.7.2 release (0.8 is not too far out at this point). So I think we > > >>> should be advising people to giving any non-critical patches just > > against > > >>> 0.8, right? > > >>> > > >>> Thoughts? > > >>> > > >>> -Jay > > >>> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
