Yes, the owner should ideally be a committer. We haven't set out official criteria for being a committer, but in my mind the criteria is a non-trivial contribution of code and an interest in ongoing contributions going forward. I think a client would meet that criteria.
I think ideally we would actually get two people for each client since otherwise we end up needing to review code in languages no one really knows, which is not ideal. -Jay On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Jeffrey Damick <jeffreydam...@gmail.com>wrote: > Would the owner have commit rights (even if just to that client code part > of the tree) ? > > > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Jay Kreps <jay.kr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > - An owner for this client who would be willing to maintain this code > > going forward. This probably isn't a hugely time consuming job, but it > is > > good to have a contact person who can be point for questions or fixes. > > >
