Hi all, I'm currently looking at the caching Kallithea does. And I'm a bit...baffled. The way I understand it is that first an entry is made to CacheInvalidation to mark a cache invalid, and later that entry is checked to decide if that cache should be invalidated. But why this detour? Why not invalidate the cache directly? Can somebody explain to me why the invalidation is done via the CacheInvalidation table?
cheers Dominik
_______________________________________________ kallithea-general mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sfconservancy.org/mailman/listinfo/kallithea-general
