On Mar 5, 7:35 am, Michael Sparks <[email protected]> wrote: > That said, I am planning on rewriting the scheduler anyway, given recent > events, so I may take the opportunity to do something somewhat more > flexible.
Just wanted to chip in my two cents. +1 to better performance of the scheduler. -1 to a rewrite if it means having the same kinds of restrictions as fibra. Components not needing to know up front who they will be connected to is a great advantage of Kamaelia. +1 to scheduler tweaks that allow .pause(timeout) semantics. +0.5 to Matt's idea of being able to mask off inboxes / outboxes whose activity should not unpause the component. --Steve --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kamaelia" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/kamaelia?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
