Hi Hannes & Sanjaya, Thanx a lot for the explanation .. Things are much more clear to me now.. Now I'm ready to get my feet wet with coding for WS-BA.. I'm sure it'll be a extiting experience with having Sanjaya, Hannes and Bimalee's team on board..
~Thilina PS: BTW I'm eager to know when Hannes will be able to contribute the source to Kandula 1.. On 12/28/06, Hannes Erven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Thilina, > What I wanted to ask is the case where some participants registered > for CC while others are registered for the PC .. Hannes has already > answered it by telling to handle two kinds of participants > separately... More or less, yes. The CoordinatorCompletion protocol is actually an extension of the ParticipantCompletion protocol with just one additional message, "Complete", and the associated state changes. In a business activity with both PC and CC participants, the initiator needs to tell the CC participants to complete. After that, CC and PC are identical so there is no need to handle them separately: both start by reporting "Completed". The only difference is that PC participants decide for themselves when work is completed, while CC participants need to be told by the coordinator. The "separate handling" referred to one business partner enrolling multiple participants in one transaction context. While I think this is legal, they still look like distinct participants to the coordinator and are handled independently from each other. -hannes
-- Thilina Gunarathne WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/ Home page: http://webservices.apache.org/~thilina/ Blog: http://thilinag.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
