>-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >Tor >Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 9:34 PM >To: [email protected] >Cc: NUUGs kartliste >Subject: Re: [NUUG kart] [Imports] N50 imports from Kartverket (The >Norwegian Mapping Authority) > >16. juni 2014 kl. 20:34 skrev Christoph Hormann <[email protected]>: > >> On Monday 16 June 2014, Tor wrote: >>> >>> As far as I know, none of the tools available for converting from >>> SOSI format to shape or OSM convert the tags. Until someone write a >>> tool that does this, this part of the conversion has to be done >>> manually (or semi-automatically). >> >> I see no reason not to use one of the import conversion tools here - >> ogr2osm can read any OGR compatible format and allows custom attribute >> to tag conversions. > >That's good news. I wasn't aware of that. > >> While in principle it is all right to do a fully manual import as you >> describe the amount of data potentially involved here would make >> automatic tag and geometry conversion advisable i think. Any >> mechanical processing step that is not done manually by the mapper is >> one place less where mistakes can occur. And the mappers involved in >> the import would be able to concentrate on the actual verification and >> conflation tasks. > >I agree. > >> For waterways I guess it's easiest to set the defaults based on >>> VANNBR, and then verify manually before import: >>> VANNBR=2 - waterway=stream >>> VANNBR=3 - waterway=river >>> VANNBR=4 - waterway=river >>> >>> For woods/forests the default would be natural=forest. >> >> That looks sensible. >
We have earlier agreed to use natural=wood on the woods/forest, see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features. -Sverre _______________________________________________ kart mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nuug.no/mailman/listinfo/kart
