>-----Original Message----- >From: Tor S. Mehus [mailto:[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 11:14 AM >To: Sverre Didriksen >Cc: [email protected]; NUUGs kartliste >Subject: Re: [NUUG kart] [Imports] N50 imports from Kartverket (The >Norwegian Mapping Authority) > >Den 17. juni 2014 kl. 11:09 skrev Sverre Didriksen ><[email protected]>: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf >Of >>> Tor >>> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2014 9:34 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: NUUGs kartliste >>> Subject: Re: [NUUG kart] [Imports] N50 imports from Kartverket (The >>> Norwegian Mapping Authority) >>> >>>> 16. juni 2014 kl. 20:34 skrev Christoph Hormann ><[email protected]>: >>>> >>>>> On Monday 16 June 2014, Tor wrote: >>>>> >>>>> As far as I know, none of the tools available for converting from >>>>> SOSI format to shape or OSM convert the tags. Until someone write a >>>>> tool that does this, this part of the conversion has to be done >>>>> manually (or semi-automatically). >>>> >>>> I see no reason not to use one of the import conversion tools here - >>>> ogr2osm can read any OGR compatible format and allows custom >attribute >>>> to tag conversions. >>> >>> That's good news. I wasn't aware of that. >>> >>>> While in principle it is all right to do a fully manual import as you >>>> describe the amount of data potentially involved here would make >>>> automatic tag and geometry conversion advisable i think. Any >>>> mechanical processing step that is not done manually by the mapper is >>>> one place less where mistakes can occur. And the mappers involved in >>>> the import would be able to concentrate on the actual verification and >>>> conflation tasks. >>> >>> I agree. >>> >>>> For waterways I guess it's easiest to set the defaults based on >>>>> VANNBR, and then verify manually before import: >>>>> VANNBR=2 - waterway=stream >>>>> VANNBR=3 - waterway=river >>>>> VANNBR=4 - waterway=river >>>>> >>>>> For woods/forests the default would be natural=forest. >>>> >>>> That looks sensible. >> >> We have earlier agreed to use natural=wood on the woods/forest, see >http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/No:Map_Features. > >That's what I meant to write: natural=wood. Sorry for the confusion.
One big problem here is that no one other than member on the import list is allowed to post comments. (and since I'm not a member will someone please forward this mail). -Sverre _______________________________________________ kart mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nuug.no/mailman/listinfo/kart
