[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > If you stick to the CML1-equivalent facilities, you'll get almost > CML1-equivalent behavior. It's "almost" partly because the hardware > symbols have more platform- and bus-type guards than they used to -- > but mostly because I have not emulated the numerous CML1 bugs.
I'm concerned by the 'platform- and bus-type guards' to which you refer. Could you give some examples where the behaviour has changed? Lots of embedded non-x86, non-ISA boxen have ISA network chips glued in somehow, for example. I hope you haven't helpfully stopped that from working. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
