[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Please help me correct them.
No. I haven't the time or the inclination to audit the whole of the CML2 rule base to check for such things. Merge a version of CML2 that matches the CML1 rules as closely as can be expressed in CML2, then submit the 'improvements' later as separate changes - change one thing at a time just like everyone else does. Then I promise I'll look at the actual behavioural changes for you as you submit them and Cc them to linux-kernel. > The definition of "behavioral change" you're implying here is so > narrow that if I interpreted the "agreement" that way", CML2 could do > nothing worthwhile. Utter crap. CML2 makes them possible, and is a step in the right direction. I'm not suggesting that you never make these changes - just that you do them separately from the change in mechanism. Go read what our Lord and Master said about why he likes Al Viro's patches. Repeatedly, if needs be. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
