Tom Rini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Perhaps that wasn't quite the right words. Statement for Statement and > no additional restrictions on questions.
Statement for statement is not going to happen, simply because the structure of the old and new languages is different. What invariant or behavior are you trying to preserve with "no additional restrictions"? Most of the additional restrictions are bus guards, so that (for example) users won't see EISA questions on a non-EISA system. Is this a bad thing? > > You want the PPC_RTC thing fixed. I'll do that. What else do *you* need? > > Showing of CONFIG options that don't have a help text, regardless of > CONFIG_ADVANCED (or whichever was the guard for that before) if you > haven't changed that since the last time someone brought it up. I've commented out the declaration that sets this guard for 2.3.1. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel