On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> 
> Where comes the requirement that we shall keep the existing shell 
> based config parsers?

I use them exclusively.

It is far and away the most convenient parsing - just to do "make
oldconfig"  (possibly by making changes by hand to the .config file
first).

As far as I'm personally concerned, the shell parsers are the _only_ 
parser that really matter. So if you want to replace them with something 
else, that something else had better be pretty much perfect and not take 
all that long to build.

                Linus



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
kbuild-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel

Reply via email to