Hi, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> +If the dependency yields "m", the first block is executed and the > +second skipped, just as with "y", but with one crucial difference: the > +output for certain verbs is restricted. "bool" and "dep_bool" > +statements are suppressed entirely; "tristate" and "dep_tristate" are > +restricted to the two values "m" and "n". The valid values for other > +verbs such as "define_bool", "dep_mbool" and "hex" are not restricted. Hmm, I should have read the description, instead of the confusing table. The more formal description I just sent should match this. Anyway, I don't know if it's really that a good idea to introduce tristate logic into if statements like this. I suspect it will confuse a lot more people. Something like: if_dep dep stmt1 else_dep stmt2 fi_dep could be transformed into stmt1 dep stmt2 dep!=n Is that really intuitive? bye, Roman ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
