Roman Zippel wrote: > > Why do you want to do the parser/syntax switch separately? Why do you want > to write and test a parser just to be throw it away again?
So that the changes have some chance of getting past Linus. > I already have all of this and I know what work and problems this would > mean. The config syntax is closely tied to how the (main) parser works. > Replacing both would mean the least problems, by replacing only one you > only create more problems. So said ESR. Greg. -- the price of civilisation today is a courageous willingness to prevail, with force, if necessary, against whatever vicious and uncomprehending enemies try to strike it down. - Roger Sandall, The Age, 28Sep2001. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
