Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 02:24:40AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
Hi Roman, I really haven't had time to look at your release properly yet, sorry. I did notice though that the converter issues warnings for dead code and comparisons of boolean variables to "m", which I thought was a good idea. > 5) Tried to delete endmenu on line 610 in arch/i386/config.in: > ./scripts/lkc/mconf arch/i386/config.new > <none>:0:parse error > This error message is not good enough. > I would like to see the language extended with some rules ala: > "A statement shall be opened and closed in the same file." > This would make it trivial when reacing end-of-file to check if there is > any pending statements. I have no idea how much will break if this > is enforced. Greg's gcml may be the best tool to investigate that - Greg? It seemed easy to add a check to gcml2 for "if" statements beginning and ending in the same file, so last night I did it. The result is... zero such cases in 2.5.33. > I dislike the requirement to convert all existing config.in files to > support the new syntax. You already have the machinery to do the > conversion online as needed, so why not detect if config.in is newer > than config.lkc and if thats the case regenerate config.lkc. I think this would be very useful if it were possible, as it would enable a gradual directory-by-directory switchover. That is a clear requirement I believe. Greg. -- the price of civilisation today is a courageous willingness to prevail, with force, if necessary, against whatever vicious and uncomprehending enemies try to strike it down. - Roger Sandall, The Age, 28Sep2001. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ kbuild-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kbuild-devel
