keith wrote: > On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 05:47, Kevin Stansell wrote: > >>>On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 15:39, Keith Owens wrote: >>> > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:54:43 -0700, >>> > keith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > >linux 2.6.7-bk4 >>> > >kdb-v4.4-2.6.7-common-1 >>> > >kdb-v4.4-2.6.7-i386-1 >>> > > >>> > >My issue is as follows... >>> > > If I don't enable kdb everything works fine. When I enable and boot >>> > >with KDB I fall into kdb when I bring the secondary cpus online. KDB >>> > >claims it was entered via an NMI. Without kdb there are no nmis being >>> > >registered by the system. >>> > >>> > This debug patch should get you up and running, and tell you where the >>> > nmi is coming from. Untested. >>> >>>Ok booted without kdb and I did not see that zone alignment error. Has >>>kdb ran on a numa i386 system before? It looks to be tinkering with the >>>VM somehow. Tomorrow I'll try disabling numa and seeing if things work. >> >>As a datapoint: I have ran KDB (with the 2.4 kernel) on a summit box in >>the past with no problems. >> > > > Do you know if the CONFIG_NUMA options were set? > > Keith > >
Yes, with SLES8 the CONFIG_X86_NUMA option is set along with CONFIG_X86_SUMMIT. -- Sincerely, Kevin Stansell IBM Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (linux) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (notes) --------------------------- Use http://oss.sgi.com/ecartis to modify your settings or to unsubscribe.
