https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377162
--- Comment #92 from zeebra <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Nate Graham from comment #89) > Please don't re-open Bugzilla tickets that developers have closed. This > isn't a forum for complaining, it's a technical bug tracker. Keep comments > technical and respect the viewpoints of the developers, who are the people > actually doing the work. > > Anyone who becomes one of those people actually doing the work by submitting > code to implement window shading on Wayland in a way that doesn't cause > architectural problems will be taken seriously. Clearly there's some demand > for it. > > But until that happens, this feature is gone on Wayland. If this frustrates > you, the solution is what I mentioned: help build a maintainable, > Wayland-compatible implementation of the feature. > > Thanks for understanding, folks! Thank you for your time. My apologies. Please do know that I respect the developers. But trust and respect should go both ways. In the case of this bug, which has been correctly reported, it is being undermined by closing it on false assumptions. If this bug (which has many duplicates) is not open, then how are developers suppose to be aware of it and prioritize it? It's ok to disagree, but if you say that this lack of feature is intentional on the account of moving from Xorg to Wayland, then you could say the same about any missing feature previous or current in KDE on Wayland. This is not a complaint, but a defence of the bug report, and justification to reopen it. You are the one who is closing this issue and not allowing it the proper attention it deserves. It should also be on your list of missing features: https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Known_Significant_Issues If this issue keeps being hidden, then how do people expect interested KDE developers to pick it up? So, please forgive my lack of technicality, and please try to understand my fighting for this issue, which is technically a bug and technically closed incorrectly. That's why I'm asking your kindness and understanding to reconsider and possibly personally re-open it. Whatever way you think this issue could gain traction and be resolved, I fully trust you could find the best way in doing so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
