https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524257
--- Comment #2 from [email protected] --- (In reply to Kai Uwe Broulik from comment #1) > Wonder if that's because we explicit use tnum for the clock (in 6.7 already > I think) and maybe that overwrites any globally set features? That would make sense, the spacing seems to match with only using tnum. I can't see an option to specify features in the widget's font selector either. (Also if it's worth anything the lock screen clock does use font features as expected) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
