https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524588
Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> --- Hi Benson, For the Aadhar validation of looking for a 'green checkmark' is actually using a deprecated and discouraged pdf extension, so I'm unsure we will really ever support it. (I've forgotten where it was discussed) - because the green checkmark can easily be faked. Validation can be done with 'normal means' of signature validation. But there is bascially 4 or 5 different descriptions for how to render that area of the document, depending on signature validity. - but other than in aadhar, haven't been used for decades. https://kbdeveloper.qoppa.com/support-multiple-entries-layers-in-the-appearance-stream-for-signatures/ It is likely doable for a determined developer to do it, but you likely need some interested person from India who can actually test it. I wouldn't mind help reviewing a human-made 'poppler' patch for this. For signing, it looks like one needs to send either the document or at least the checksum and do some server-phone-okular 3-way pingpong. This is not a concept currently supported in 'poppler' (the library we use for pdf handling), so it will be a massive amount of work for a skilled person. This is likely 'hire some human to do it'-work, if one should look at Nate's old blog post: https://pointieststick.com/2023/07/16/where-bugfixes-and-new-features-come-from/ I'm not as such against it, it could also be interesting for other countries national signature things where a remote service also is involved, but it need to be well designed and thought-out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
