On 3/30/06, Tanner Lovelace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/30/06, Alexander Neundorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To me it's still unclear how we want/need to use the Qt debug libs. > > It seems on windows the debug libs should be used if we are doing a debug > > build, and then our debug libs should also get different names than the > > non-debug libs (on windows, msvc only or mingw too?) > > Well, I think the *_DEBUG variables should probably be set > since I think that's what gets used for debug builds in XCode > (and Visual Studio too, I believe).
Actually, never mind. If I had just looked further down in FindQt4.cmake I would have discovered that the _QT4_ADJUST_LIB_VARS macro automatically sets libraries to the release version if the debug version isn't found. With that I think we can do away with different ways of searching for the libraries. I've got a patch to do that and I'm just testing it right now to make sure it actually does what I think it does. I've attached it, so please take a look and see if it looks ok. If so, I'll commit it after I verify that everything still compiles. Also, btw, in the patch, I moved the windowing system check up as high as it could go (just after QT_INCLUDE_DIR is set) and use that to bypass things like checking for QtMotif when not working with Qt/X11. Cheers, Tanner -- Tanner Lovelace clubjuggler at gmail dot com http://wtl.wayfarer.org/ (fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an increscent, all sable.
fix-framework-find-library.patch
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
