On Thursday 30 March 2006 23:18, Alexander Neundorf wrote: > On Thursday 30 March 2006 23:08, Tanner Lovelace wrote: > ... > > For debug libraries, however, in order to find them within frameworks > > we'll need to add what is essentially the non-debug name to the list of > > libraries to be searched for. On non OS X platforms (or OS X where > > Qt libraries are used instead of frameworks) this would mean that the > > debug library defines could be set to release libraries. So, we probably > > need some sort of differentiation there, but we still should be able to use > > find_library (assuming the above behavior works correctly). > > To me it's still unclear how we want/need to use the Qt debug libs. > It seems on windows the debug libs should be used if we are doing a debug > build, and then our debug libs should also get different names than the > non-debug libs (on windows, msvc only or mingw too?)
I would wait for Qt-4.2 before solving the release vs debug problem, since there are rumours that Qt-4.2 might change this all (possibly by not having a different .so name for debug libraries anymore). -- David Faure, [EMAIL PROTECTED], sponsored by Trolltech to work on KDE, Konqueror (http://www.konqueror.org), and KOffice (http://www.koffice.org). _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
