Allen Winter wrote: >On Wednesday 09 July 2008 04:16:55 David Faure wrote: >> On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> > Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > >> Also, should we add lib32? Or the 4 recommended suffixes for >> > >> Itanium? >> > > >> > >Which are ? >> > >> > The suffixes recommended by Intel are: >> > >> > lib/ia64l32 >> > lib/ia64b32 >> > lib/ia64l64 >> > lib/ia64b64 >> > >> > Even though it's recommended like that, neither the Itanium running >> > Linux we have at the office nor the Itanium running HP-UXi use that >> > (HP-UXi uses lib/hpux32 and lib/hpux64). >> >> Let's forget about that then, if it's only theoretical :-) > >Agreed. We can deal with those if/when the time comes. >4.1!
It's interesting how much stuff the Intel engineers came up with for the Itanium besides the chip itself: - they helped gcc - they wrote a full C++ ABI - they wrote a full System V ABI manual (calling conventions, system calls, ELF relocations, headers, constants) :-) -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
