On Wednesday 09 July 2008 09:26:21 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Allen Winter wrote: > >On Wednesday 09 July 2008 04:16:55 David Faure wrote: > >> On Wednesday 09 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >> > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > >> > >> Also, should we add lib32? Or the 4 recommended suffixes for > >> > >> Itanium? > >> > > > >> > >Which are ? > >> > > >> > The suffixes recommended by Intel are: > >> > > >> > lib/ia64l32 > >> > lib/ia64b32 > >> > lib/ia64l64 > >> > lib/ia64b64 > >> > > >> > Even though it's recommended like that, neither the Itanium running > >> > Linux we have at the office nor the Itanium running HP-UXi use that > >> > (HP-UXi uses lib/hpux32 and lib/hpux64). > >> > >> Let's forget about that then, if it's only theoretical :-) > > > >Agreed. We can deal with those if/when the time comes. > >4.1! > > It's interesting how much stuff the Intel engineers came up with for the > Itanium besides the chip itself: > > - they helped gcc > - they wrote a full C++ ABI > - they wrote a full System V ABI manual > (calling conventions, system calls, ELF relocations, headers, > constants) > yep. now, if they would just make the free version available for Fedora 9.
I used icc and friends when I had Fedora 6 every now and then. _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
