On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:24:59PM -0000, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: >> > On Jan. 29, 2012, 4:42 p.m., Alexander Neundorf wrote: >> > > The change in FindPAM.cmake is wrong. >> > > FindPAM.cmake does not care whether WITH_PAM is TRUE or not, when >> > > called, it will search PAM. >> > > If WITH_PAM is disabled, FindPAM.cmake will not be executed, and >> > > additionally all PAM_* variables will be set to empty. >> > > It should work without the change in FindPAM.cmake. >> > >> > Michael Palimaka wrote: >> > That is intended behaviour. It should be possible to compile >> > kcheckpass and KDM without PAM support, even if PAM is present on the >> > system. >> >> Hello Alexander, please have a look at the following gentoo bugs [1] [2]. >> ossi verified the issue (from #kde-devel): >> <ossi> tampakrap: seems like it got lost during the cmake migration. too bad >> <ossi> actually, i was assuming that it is possible to manually set >> PAM_LIBRARY to NOTFOUND and cmake wouldn't try to find it again >> > i didn't verify anything. i said that the code to disable it explicitly > is gone. if WITH_PAM is supposed to be handled automatically, then so be > it. that's why i sent you to this list.
I apologize for misinterpreting your words then _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
