Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> writes: > >> For what it's worth, I don't think we should have code in ecm which >> appears to work with older compilers unless we actually test it. None of >> us (I presume?) are still using GCC 4.1 or 4.2 and want to use 'the KDE >> compiler settings' with it. >> >> If in the future someone comes along who wants to have that stuff built >> into ECM/KDE settings, they should commit to maintaining it and it can be >> added then, no? Otherwise it's just dead untested code. > > FWIW, FreeBSD (and OS X, and perhaps other BSD flavours) are still on > gcc 4.2.1 (there's work towards making clang the default compiler on > FreeBSD, but that's another story), so it'd be good to have at least gcc > 4.2 supported -- is that too much of a burden? I could help test things > on it if it's needed.
For KDE Frameworks 5, gcc 4.2 is too old. Qt5 requires a much more recent version (I don't recall which exactly). For the KDECompilerFlags.cmake file, I don't know. Maybe you want to ensure that that's usable for non KDE Frameworks code which still uses gcc 4.2. Currently it has no users outside of KDE frameworks branch. Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
