On Sunday 28 December 2014 13:39:47 David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 10 December 2014 12:49:45 Alexander Neundorf wrote: > > Another option would be to upstream KDEInstallDirs.cmake into cmake, then > > the CMAKE_ prefix would be Ok, and the two files > > (GNU|KDEInstallDirs.cmake) > > should actually follow the same guidelines. > > Would that even be accepted into cmake? > It would force requiring very-latest cmake, too. Unless we wait for a long > time before porting to that new cmake module - but then it better not have > the same name as the one in ECM, otherwise the wrong one will be picked up > for some people... > > At this point it seems this suggestion stalled progress completely, since > that's a whole other direction to take, with many more complications and an > uncertain outcome...
Oh, yeah, I never replied to this, sorry. I don't think that's the right approach, both for the reasons David listed and because there are variables in there that I believe really belong in the *Config.cmake files of various frameworks. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-buildsystem mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
