On Aug. 7, 2015, 1:37 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > One other thing, the "l10nSystem" class is a source updater and a build
> > system combined, and has a 'needsRefreshed' sub that would also need
> > updated. Something like this diff should work:
> >
> > diff --git a/modules/ksb/l10nSystem.pm b/modules/ksb/l10nSystem.pm
> > index e5756f8..0101824 100644
> > --- a/modules/ksb/l10nSystem.pm
> > +++ b/modules/ksb/l10nSystem.pm
> > @@ -24,7 +24,9 @@ sub new
> > # TODO: Support different localization branches?
> >
> > $module->setOption('module-base-path', 'trunk/l10n-kde4');
> > - return bless { module => $module, needsRefreshed => 1 }, $class;
> > +
> > + my $refreshMessage = "couldn't verify the source is unchanged";
> > + return bless { module => $module, needsRefreshed =>
> > $refreshMessage }, $class;
> > }
> >
> > sub module
> > @@ -75,7 +77,7 @@ sub updateInternal
> > $self->check_module_validity();
> > my $count = $self->update_module_path(@dirs);
> >
> > - $self->{needsRefreshed} = 0 if $count == 0;
> > + $self->{needsRefreshed} = '' if $count == 0;
> > return $count;
> > }
> > else {
> > @@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ sub needsRefreshed
> > {
> > my $self = shift;
> >
> > - # Should be 1 except if no update happened.
> > + # Should be a 'reason' string except if no update happened.
> > return $self->{needsRefreshed};
> > }
> >
> > With those taken care of you have a +1 from me.
>
> David Faure wrote:
> Since the value is set to empty (in the 2nd hunk) when no files were
> updated by "svn update", doesn't this mean that the message in the first hunk
> should be "an update happened"?
That would be a more positive (and probably more understandable) way of wording
it, yes.
- Michael
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124613/#review83527
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Aug. 9, 2015, 9:36 a.m., David Faure wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124613/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Aug. 9, 2015, 9:36 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Build System and Michael Pyne.
>
>
> Repository: kdesrc-build
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> i.e. be more precise than "meets other building criteria"
>
> REVIEW: 124613
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> modules/ksb/IPC.pm 0e55c5fe5c2a8771f6b9b159a684bdcc6dda52a7
> modules/ksb/Module.pm a7a7fbcc5e30cbb4c52979d87407a3250b80f2b2
> modules/ksb/l10nSystem.pm e5756f85026ad9b95533d2989746ab91f87920a6
> modules/ksb/BuildSystem.pm 24963040d77dc93f8f86a2f19755c617713bbd8a
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124613/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Example:
>
> $ kdesrc-build --refresh plasma-nm
>
> Building plasma-nm from kf5-network-management (1/1)
> Updating plasma-nm (to branch master)
> No source update, but the option refresh-build was set
> Source update complete for plasma-nm: no files affected
> Preparing build system for plasma-nm.
> ...
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Faure
>
>
_______________________________________________
Kde-buildsystem mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-buildsystem
