On Thursday, 2014-01-16, 01:33:34, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimecres, 15 de gener de 2014, a les 21:47:17, John Layt va escriure: > > Hi, > > > > * Application domain-specific libraries such as libkipi or libkcddb > > may now be better organised under Frameworks rather than their > > modules, where they could gain a wider user base and a clearer > > maintenance viability. Can we have a Frameworks category for non-api > > stable libraries? > > I am not sure I would call it "Frameworks", but yes, that makes total sense, > for example at the moment our mobipocket library just uses QtCore and QtGui > but since it's using all the KDE cmake stuff it's not that easy to re-use > "from the outside".
I also think it is important to not call those "Frameworks", because it dilutes the assumption we want developers to make about Frameworks, e.g. stable, maintained, scheduled releases, etc. Cheers, Kevin -- Kevin Krammer, KDE developer, xdg-utils developer KDE user support, developer mentoring
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ kde-community mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
